?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Discussion of the Day: Un-asked Questions - Multiplayer vi [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tomas Gallucci

counter customisable

[ flavors | Meta Profile ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Value for Value Politics Tech Reads ]

Discussion of the Day: Un-asked Questions [Sep. 20th, 2010|03:35 pm]
Tomas Gallucci
Do you hate it when you make a post and decide not to ramble on about a topic and instead leave hooks in the post so you can expand on said topics in the comments only to have no one ask you the questions you were anticipating?

What do you do in those situations? Do you go ahead and throw everything in the original post? Do you make a second post filling in the gaps? Do you shrug it off and move on?

Discuss.
linkReply

Comments:
From: (Anonymous)
2010-09-20 04:41 pm (UTC)

Hooks

I think I'd lay out my opinion first, and let people respond to that position. I think it'd be more effective than trying to be subtle and get your readers to state their opinion first.

If it warranted it, I'd probably reply in the comments but if a theme emerged I'd probably write a second blog referencing it and synthesizing that comment stream together into a neat package... then repeat!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: schpydurx
2010-09-20 04:46 pm (UTC)

Re: Hooks

Thanks for the tip.

P.S. You forgot to log in.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2010-09-20 05:16 pm (UTC)
What do you do in those situations?

Its often surprised what does, or in some cases does not, get commented on. At least it used to. I've grown accustomed to it. Regardless, since my blog posts are for myself, I guess the answer is all three.

If my post is fascinating enough, and has good meter, including it is a great idea - if not, it just becomes tl;dr - even for me! I'll make a second post about it if I feel the need, regardless of whether or not any one did or did not comment on it. Again, I write for an audience of one: Myself. Which brings us to shrugging it off. Which is what I do with most of my posts in which there's little or no participation.

Once you start writing for you, these banal questions will cease.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mrs_dragon
2010-09-20 08:49 pm (UTC)
I don't leave "hooks". I say what I want to say. When I want opinions on something specifically, I ask for it. Otherwise, people are free to ramble on about whatever. But, like ehowton above, I write for myself. Whether or not anyone comments isn't really the point.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: newmistakes
2010-11-12 03:32 am (UTC)
I don't leave conscious hooks and that's probably a good thing because I've found most people don't think like me and ask really different questions to the kind I would ask anyway. If it's something I want to say or I think is important I'd plonk it in the post or if I'd forgotten it I'd probably edit the post to include it.

What kind of hooks have you left out there that haven't caught any fish? Or is it too soon to tell me things like that yet? :P
(Reply) (Thread)