?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Retraction - Multiplayer vi [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tomas Gallucci

counter customisable

[ flavors | Meta Profile ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Value for Value Politics Tech Reads ]

Retraction [Apr. 14th, 2008|09:17 am]
Tomas Gallucci
[Tags|, ]



My friends, I want to apologize for my recent actions.

Yesterday, I received a phone call stating that my account had been hacked because frozen comments had been deleted. In past experience with frozen comments, once frozen they could only be deleted by the owner of the blog that froze them. Live Journal has apparently done an about face on this. I are still investigating the issue.

With regards to deleting comments, I find this a shitty thing to do. It throws off the threads. Those that read the comments regularly remember what is written within them, proving the old adage, Words once spoken cannot be taken back.

I would like to apologize to Miss Ellis for the inconvenience caused by this comedy of errors. Had the facts been better checked this would not have occurred. My most recent post was made in error and will therefore be turned into a protected post so that the comments may continue to exist but the site only accessible to a few.

I am still investigating the possibility of restitution and rectification. Please bear with me as I work through this issue.

I apologize for any inconvenience that this might have caused.


linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: melancthe
2008-04-14 03:36 pm (UTC)
Had the facts been better checked this would not have occurred.

My most recent post was made in error


Passive voice is for pussies. Real men accept responsibility and admit their mistakes. Your most recent post didn't just get "made in error". YOU screwed up.

I am still investigating the possibility of restitution and rectification.

Why not say you fucked up and are trying to fix your screw-up? Double-speak is for pussies.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2008-04-14 05:52 pm (UTC)
Look, I don't think that he's not responding because he's a pussy - I think he's just busy. Regardless of that fact, so what? What if he is a pussy? Some of us were bred for great things; others, for helping those who were bred for great things make them happen. I say don't look down on the pussies of the world. Not everyone can aspire to greatness, no matter what we were told as children. They'll never put a pussy in the White House and I'm not talking about Mrs. Clinton here.

Instead of focusing on the negative of his pussy-like tendencies and chiding him for them, can't we exalt them? Place the pussy up on a pedestal, for example. Worship the pussy.

I know I do.

Edited at 2008-04-14 05:53 pm (UTC)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: melancthe
2008-04-14 06:43 pm (UTC)
I think I see the error of my ways. Being called a pussy should be a good thing; lucky schpydurx doesn't have to do anything more in order to be called one already. And to think I was not only going to revile him further, but also call him a spreading red stain on the white dress of humanity!

How should I mend my ways? I have a duty to the little people, you know. Perhaps I could be kind to schpydurx and make him feel a little bit important? Enquire after his health, that kind of thing?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2008-04-14 06:50 pm (UTC)
...but also call him a spreading red stain on the white dress of humanity!

You win.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: schpydurx
2008-04-14 09:55 pm (UTC)
since you have continually insulted me and refused to look at teh facts for what they were and now want to come utter such psycho-babble on my blog after you have accused me multiple times of making you feel uncomfortable, I am therefore removing you from my FL and banning your presence on this blog.

Good Day.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2008-04-15 06:34 pm (UTC)
Didn't she ban you on neutral territory dude, to allow you the courtesy of responding?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: schpydurx
2008-04-15 07:01 pm (UTC)
The feelings on this are mutual and there is nothing to discuss. If she wishes to use either her or any other public blog to voice her grievances, who am I to stop her?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2008-04-14 03:52 pm (UTC)
Yesterday, I received a phone call stating that my account had been hacked because frozen comments had been deleted.
You rec'd a supposition, a hypothesis, based on many things. Running with 'hacked' only because information concerning the security of your password had come to light. Man up, pussy.

I are still investigating the issue.
There could cause proper usage. As to make clarity meaning. Wot tenses? Intransitive verb are hards.

With regards to deleting comments, I find this a shitty thing to do.
In this, you and I are equals. We see eye-to-eye. It is an act of cowardice; reprehensible. Despite your many pontifications of foolishness, you've never once deleted something stupid you've said. I respect that. That being said, un-puss yourself and at least modify out the incriminating evidence, seeing how it was posted on inaccurate assumptions.

I would like to apologize to Miss Ellis for the inconvenience caused by this comedy of errors.
That's very sweet. Now stop being a pussy and obfuscate the parts of your post which incriminate her.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: schpydurx
2008-04-15 07:02 pm (UTC)
It's behind a protected post and is therefore not publically searchable or indexable. I do not see the need for this as the few that have acces to this information know to whom I refer.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ehowton
2008-04-15 07:05 pm (UTC)
Ok.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)